REVIEW FORM

CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION - CEC'99

COMMENTS FOR THE TECHNICAL CHAIRS / PROGRAM COMMITTEE
_____________________________________________________________________

Paper Number    :

Paper Title     :

Author(s)       :

Reviewer Number :

Reviewer Name   :


A. Type of Paper

(1) ____ Research Results
(2) ____ Survey
(3) ____ Tutorial
(4) ____ Philosophical / Speculative


B. Description of the paper

B.1 Algorithmic study
(1) ____ Convergence 
(2) ____ Representation
(3) ____ Operators (crossover, mutation,...)
(4) ____ Selection
(5) ____ Coevolution
(6) ____ Parallelization
(7) ____ Hybridization 
(8) ____ None
(9) ____ Other (please specify):



B.2 Application: How "real-world" is it ?
(1) ____ Already in exploitation
(2) ____ Results on real data
(3) ____ Results on simulated data for a real-world problem
(4) ____ Toy problem, simplified from real-world
(5) ____ Generic problem (e.g. TSP!), results on benchmark databases
(6) ____ Toy problem  
(7) ____ None (purely theoretical).
	

B.3 Application area (if relevant) in a few words:



C.1 Recommendation

(1) ____ Strong Accept
(2) ____ Weak   Accept
(3) ____ Marginal
(4) ____ Weak   Reject
(5) ____ Strong Reject

C.2 Rank your recomandation to include a revised version 
of this paper in the forthcoming Special Issue of 
"Knowledge Based Systems" Journal. 
10 = MUST be included, 0 = definitively reject that paper  ___

D. Confidence in Decision / Subject Area

(1) ____ Very     High
(2) ____ Somewhat High
(3) ____ Marginal
(4) ____ Fairly   Low
(5) ____ Very     Low


E. Of the papers that I am reviewing, I RANK this paper: ___ Out of ___
   (1 = best, n = worst)


F. Summary (Very IMPORTANT, please don't forget this.)

SUMMARY: Reviewer: ##  Paper: ####  Rec: #  Conf: # Rank: ## Out_of: ##


G. Comments to the Technical Chairs / Program Committee: